If you must assess oral proficiency– which should not be done before the end of Level 2, in my humble opinion– here is the world’s simplest hack. No more interviews, “speaking tasks” and hassles where you sit with one kid and the other 28 are off-ta– err, I mean, doing their Kahoots or whatever.
In a C.I. class, because any feedback other than “pay more attention & ask for help” doesn’t do anything for acquisition, and because testing wastes time by not delivering input, we want to put as little time and effort into Assigning Numberz as possible. We also never want to assign role-plays or “pretend you’re customer and sales associate”-type scenarios, which test memorisation rather than spontaneous communication.
This is what we do not want.
This is very simple. Starting in the last 1/4 or so of level 2 Spanish, I randomly check on how kids communicate in class. Do they ask and answer questions? Do they use complete sentences? Can they initiate and sustain conversation? To what if any extent do their speaking errors interfere with communication?
Every two weeks, I give each kid a score out of three. At the end of the year, I average these and that’s their oral mark. If the kids disagree, they can come in for a formal oral interview. (If they choose this, it is totally unstructured and unplanned ie they cannot prepare and memorise Qs & As. I will ask them to tell me a story including dialogue, and we will basically ask each other questions.) I have to be conscious: some days kids are sick, exhausted etc, so the score has to reflect their overall (ie best possible) proficiency.
This is the first year I have done this and not a single kid complained about their mark.
Here’s the marking rubric. Go ahead and steal it but please acknowledge authorship. Note that the rubric will generate a mark between four and twelve.
Oral proficiency is evaluated in the last ¼ of Spanish 11. I will note how you communicate in class. If you disagree with your oral mark, please come in for a one-on-one interview. I am available Fridays after 2:30.
When using Spanish, for a score of ___, I
— ask and answer questions in complete sentences.
— initiate and sustain conversations.
— demonstrate understanding of what is being said to me
— have minor errors that do not interfere with meaning
2 (basic proficiency)
— occasionally ask and answer questions in complete sentences
— sometimes initiate and sustain conversations
— generally demonstrate understanding of what is being said to me
— have errors that noticeably interfere with meaning
1 (not yet proficient)
— use mostly one-word statements
— don’t sustain or initiate conversations
— often don’t clearly understand what is being said to me
— have errors that consistently block meaning